Introductions to the Wissenschaftslehre and other writings, of the Wissenschaftslehre — Review of the Journal for truth — Note to “Fichte and Kant”. Introductions to the Wissenschaftslehre and other writings, / J.G. Fichte ; edited and translated, with an introduction and notes, by Daniel Breazeale. Original title: Erste Einleitung in die Wissenschaftslehre () The present introduction was written by Fichte in , three years after the.

Author: Negal Aram
Country: Uzbekistan
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Sex
Published (Last): 7 May 2008
Pages: 399
PDF File Size: 17.40 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.85 Mb
ISBN: 386-6-19154-918-6
Downloads: 12046
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kikasa

Now the representation of the independence of the Ego and that of the Thing can very well exist together but not the independence itself of both. The principle in question simply states that the essence of I-hood lies in the assertion of ones own self-identity, i. Wissenschaftlehre second series, In introductiions portion of the system the world is considered neither as it simply is nor as it simply ought to be; instead, either the practical realm of freedom is viewed from the theoretical perspective of the natural world in which case one considers the postulates that theoretical reason addresses to practical reason or else, alternatively, the natural world is viewed from the perspective of practical reason or the moral law in which case one considers the postulates that practical reason addresses to theoretical reason.

No categories specified categorize this paper. Though Fichte conceded that neither dogmatism nor idealism could directly refute its opposite and thus recognized that the choice between philosophical starting points could never be resolved on purely theoretical grounds, he nevertheless denied that any dogmatic system, that is to say, any system that commences with the concept of sheer ficute, could ever succeed in accomplishing what was required of all philosophy.

She recovered, but Fichte caught the disease and died in Following the completion of these projects, Fichte devoted his time in Zurich to rethinking and revising his own philosophical position.

Johann Gottlieb Fichte (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

But wissenschaftsleher will have to add the thought of an Intelligence, for which the Thing is to be; while, on the contrary, the Intelligence is self-sufficient and requires no additional thought. This entry has no external links. In Fichte’s wife Johanna became ill with typhus when nursing soldiers in the struggle against Napoleon.

Attempt at a New Presentation of the Wissenschaftslehre. The laws of action of the Intelligence, as sure as they are to be founded in the one nature of the Intelligence, constitute in themselves a system; that is to say, the fact that the Intelligence acts in this particular manner under this particular condition is explainable, and explainable because under a condition it has always a determined mode of action, which again is explainable from one highest fundamental law.

  DOD 1327.5 PDF

According to the Dogmatist, all phenomena of our consciousness are productions of a Thing thhe itselfeven our pretended determinations by freedom, and the belief that we are free. The Intelligence you will not get, unless you add it in thinking as the primary and absolute, the connection of which, with this your independent Being, you will find it very difficult to explain.

Introductions to the Wissenschaftslehre and other writings, 1797-1800

Others, however, we refer to a Truth as their model, which is held to be firmly fixed, independent of us; and in determining such representations, we find ourselves conditioned by the necessity of their harmony with this Truth. On purely a priori grounds, therefore, Fichte purports to be able to determine the general requirements of such a community and the sole justification for intrroductions political coercion and obligation.

Selected pages Title Page.

Or somebody might say: Now, since the problem, to explain experience from its ground, is a problem contained in human reason, and as no rational man will admit that human reason contains any problem the solution of which is altogether impossible; and since, moreover, there are only two ways of solving it, the dogmatic system, which, as we have shown, cannot accomplish what it promises and the Idealistic system, every resolute Thinker will always declare that the latter has been the case; that the presupposition in itself is correct enough, and that no failure in attempts to represent it should deter men from attempting it again until finally it must succeed.

In the present sketch I write only for those, in whom there still dwells an inner wissenschaftselhre of love for truth; who still value science and conviction, and who are impelled by a lively dichte to seek truth.

Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Introductions to the Wissenschaftslehre and Other Writings – PhilPapers

Request removal from index. From the same reason actual Existence can not well be ascribed to the Intelligence, since such Existence is the result of reciprocal causality, but there is nothing wherewith the Intelligence might be placed in reciprocal causality. On the Basis of Our Belief in a Divine. With the death of his patron, Fichte was forced to discontinue his studies and seek his livelihood as a private tutor, a profession he quickly came to detest.

Hence Dogmatism can only repeat its principle, and repeat it in different forms; can only assert and re-assert the same thing; but it can not proceed from what it asserts to what is to be explained, nor ever deduce the one from the other.

If somebody should wish to remind us that the conception of a ground must be differently explained, we can, to be sure, not prevent him from forming another conception of it, if he so chooses; but we declare, on the strength of our good right, that we, in the above description of Philosophy, wish to have nothing else understood by that word.


His study of the writings of K.

Hence, on the field of Practical Reason and of Reflective Judgment, this half criticism, lacking the insight into the whole procedure of reason, gropes about as in total darkness. True, the former system has the advantage, as we have already said, of being enabled to point out its explanatory ground of all experience—the free acting intelligence—as a fact of consciousness.

State University of New York Press. Fichte presents an a priori argument for the fundamentally social character of human beings, an argument grounded upon an analysis of the very structure of self-consciousness and the requirements for self-positing. Views Read Edit View history.

By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Introduction to Fichte’s Science of Knowledge

An invaluable research tool. Every logical dogmatist is necessarily a Fatalist; he does not deny the fact of consciousness, that we consider ourselves free—for this would be against reason;—but he proves from his principle that this is a false view. Foundations of Transcendental Philosophy Wissenschaftslehre nova methodotrans. His Faith in himself is immediate.

As far as the latter is concerned, I will cheerfully assume all the blame, until others shall represent it so as to make it comprehensible, when students will doubtless discover that my representation was not so very bad after all; or I will assume it altogether and unconditionally, if the reader thereby should be encouraged to study the present representation, in which I shall endeavor to be as clear as possible.

His extraordinary intellectual talent soon brought him to the attention of a local baron, who sponsored his education, first in the home of a local pastor, then at the famous Pforta boarding school, and finally at the universities of Jena and Leipzig. Hence, this Science expects few proselytes from men who have already formed their character; if our Philosophy has any hopes at all, it entertains them rather from the young generation, the natural vigor of which has not yet been submerged in the weak-mindedness of the age.

In Feburary and March of ficyte gave a series of private lectures on his conception of philosophy before a small circle of influential clerics and intellectuals in Zurich. Intriductions, it cannot even posit for itself its own limitations, in the sense of producing or creating these limits.